Telehealth and the SSIS-SEL
The SSIS SEL can be administered in a telehealth context by utilizing Pearson’s Q-Global® software system. Details regarding the Q-global system and how it is used are provided on the Q-global product page. For additional support, please refer to the Resource Library tab in Q-global. Open the SSIS SEL folder and click on the document titled "Using your Digital Assets on Q-global".
The SSIS SEL has three components: Two evaluation tools; The Screening and Progress Monitoring Scales, and the Rating Forms; and an aligned SEL curriculum; the Classwide Intervention Program.
Administration formats for the Evaluation tools: The Screening and Monitoring scales include a rating form that is completed by teachers. The Rating Scales are available in three administration forms: A Student form (ages 8-18:11), a Parent form (ages 3-18:11) and a Teacher form (ages 3-18:11). Please refer to the SSIS SEL edition Manual to help with decisions regarding which forms are appropriate for each client/referral question.
How to Use Components in a Telehealth setting
Theme-specific information for forced-choice assessment administrations and the SSIS SEL
Using SSIS SEL assessment and intervention tools in a telehealth service delivery model requires an understanding of the interplay between a number of complex issues. In addition to the general information on our telehealth overview page, professionals should address five factors (Eichstadt et al., 2013) when planning for administering SSIS SEL via telehealth:
Select References to Date
Please refer to the following studies for considerations regarding telehealth:
Butcher, J., Perry, J., & Hahn, J. (2004). Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 331-345.
Henry, B.W., Block, D.E., Ciesla, J.R., et al. (2017). Clinician behaviors in telehealth care delivery: a systematic review. Advances in health science education, 22, 869–888 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9717-2
Juárez, A. P., Weitlauf, A. S., et al. (2018). Early Identification of ASD Through Telemedicine: Potential Value for Underserved Populations. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 48(8), 2601–2610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3524-y
Luxton, D. D., Pruitt, L. D., & Osenbach, J. E. (2014). Best practices for remote psychological assessment via telehealth technologies. Professional psychology: research and practice, 45(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034547
Russell M. et al (2003). Computer-Based Testing and Validity: A Look Back and into the Future. Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College.

A customer reflects on using Q-global digital stimulus books and manuals:
Q-Global has been a great solution for us. Managing testing materials between a variety of sites and districts could be very tricky. The online testing materials have completely resolved any access challenges we faced. Observing and recording the client's response through telehealth continues to require a good deal of coordination- particularly for pointing activities. However, the clinician being able to directly manage test stimuli and present them to the client through screen share technology makes that process much less cumbersome.
Thank you for being so proactive with making your tools accessible to telepractitioners!
Nate Cornish, MS, CCC-SLP
Clinical Director
VocoVision